Arv og miljø

Quality:

Nature versus nurture - relative importance of an individual's innate qualities ("nature" in the sense of nativism or innatism) as compared to an individual's personal experiences ("nurture" in the sense of empiricism or behaviorism). Article “Arv og miljø” in Danish Wikipedia has 15.4 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 9 references and 6 sections.

This article has the best quality in English Wikipedia. Also, this article is the most popular in that (Danish) language version.

Since the creation of article “Arv og miljø”, its content was written by 37 registered users of Danish Wikipedia and edited by 1039 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 12 times in Danish Wikipedia and cited 2051 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

• Local (Danish): #138 in December 2011
• Global: #352 in February 2002

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

• Local (Danish): #3784 in May 2010
• Global: #14132 in September 2010

There are 24 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

#	Language	Quality grade	Quality score
1	English (en) Nature versus nurture		70.5097
2	Chinese (zh) 先天与后天		63.2009
3	Spanish (es) Naturaleza versus crianza		54.5047
4	Portuguese (pt) Inato ou adquirido		42.491
5	Hebrew (he) תורשה מול סביבה		40.4135
6	Japanese (ja) 生まれか育ちか		39.4384
7	Czech (cs) Dědičnost proti prostředí		34.6221
8	Hungarian (hu) Öröklés-környezet vita		30.4089
9	Finnish (fi) Luonto vastaan kasvatus		28.6972
10	Polish (pl) Nature versus nurture		25.9664

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	English (en) Nature versus nurture		8 032 986
2	Spanish (es) Naturaleza versus crianza		911 098
3	Dutch (nl) Nature-nurture-debat		411 234
4	Chinese (zh) 先天与后天		125 141
5	Portuguese (pt) Inato ou adquirido		111 851
6	Danish (da) Arv og miljø		87 848
7	Swedish (sv) Arv eller miljö		72 999
8	French (fr) Débat inné et acquis		65 912
9	Russian (ru) Социогенетизм или биогенетизм		62 575
10	Polish (pl) Nature versus nurture		54 903

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

#	Language	Popularity award	Relative popularity
1	English (en) Nature versus nurture		11 710
2	Simple English (simple) Nature versus nurture		952
3	Chinese (zh) 先天与后天		541
4	French (fr) Débat inné et acquis		500
5	Spanish (es) Naturaleza versus crianza		465
6	Dutch (nl) Nature-nurture-debat		410
7	Russian (ru) Социогенетизм или биогенетизм		281
8	Japanese (ja) 生まれか育ちか		217
9	Hindi (hi) प्रकृति बनाम पोषण		169
10	Portuguese (pt) Inato ou adquirido		158

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	English (en) Nature versus nurture		600
2	Dutch (nl) Nature-nurture-debat		61
3	Spanish (es) Naturaleza versus crianza		51
4	Danish (da) Arv og miljø		37
5	Finnish (fi) Luonto vastaan kasvatus		32
6	Russian (ru) Социогенетизм или биогенетизм		30
7	Chinese (zh) 先天与后天		28
8	Portuguese (pt) Inato ou adquirido		23
9	Czech (cs) Dědičnost proti prostředí		21
10	French (fr) Débat inné et acquis		19

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

#	Language	AI award	Relative AI
1	English (en) Nature versus nurture		3
2	Korean (ko) 본성 대 양육		1
3	Arabic (ar) الطبيعة ضد التنشئة		0
4	Azerbaijani (az) Təbiət yoxsa tərbiyə		0
5	Bulgarian (bg) Емпиризъм или биогенетизъм		0
6	Czech (cs) Dědičnost proti prostředí		0
7	Danish (da) Arv og miljø		0
8	Spanish (es) Naturaleza versus crianza		0
9	Persian (fa) سرشت و پرورش		0
10	Finnish (fi) Luonto vastaan kasvatus		0

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

On 16 March 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: 98th Academy Awards, Michael B. Jordan, Sinners, Jessie Buckley, Paul Thomas Anderson, Sean Penn, One Battle After Another, Amy Madigan, Hamnet, Timothée Chalamet.

In Danish Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Alex Vanopslagh, Sinners (film fra 2025), Helle Faber, Joachim Trier, May Lifschitz, Troels Lund Poulsen, The Homesman, Affektionsværdi, Meningsmålinger forud for folketingsvalget 2026, Hamnet (film).

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information